Forum Discussion
keevin
6 years agoNew Contributor
I dont think its Bit Defender. The virus signatures match up with CLAM AV, which makes sense since there is no cost to it. All they have to do is develop against it.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Clam_AntiVirus
- RDiaz6 years agoNew Contributor
Well if it IS ClamAV we would not be interested at all. Last time I checked ClamAV with places like AV-Test it had less than a 20% detection rate for windows. At that point why even bother since windows defender would be better. I know there are ways of improving on this by using third-party signatures but the nature of this means you have to be vigilant in maintaining these. Overall we'll just keep and re-sub Symantec AV.