Forum Discussion
GregG2
5 months agoActive Contributor
Incorrect incoming Caller ID names
Hello, For the past 10 days or so, we are seeing a large number of incoming Caller ID names displaying random names. So far, support has pointed us to the carriers, but the ones we are able to chec...
- 4 months ago
1/7/2026 update:
At this stage the issue from last September is largely resolved. If you are having issues with incorrect Caller IDs please read this article first.
Things to keep in mind:
If you are having trouble with your caller ID's not displaying properly on outbound calls, use these steps to perform initial troubleshooting before contacting Customer Support. You will also learn what situations we are unable to help regarding caller ID issues.
First, there are some situations when Caller ID is not guaranteed to work. Verify you are not attempting the following:
- Toll-free calls — Caller ID is not guaranteed when using a toll-free number.
- Canadian calls — Caller ID works differently in Canada and it is up to each provider to pass through the Caller ID set in the admin portal.
- Rate Centers— Caller ID reflects the city and state of the rate center the phone number is from. Not every city has rate centers so some cities cannot be displayed.
- Feature Not Activated with Provider — If using a cell phone to test with, verify that you have paid for the caller ID feature with your provider, otherwise you will not get valid results.
_______________________________________________________________________________________________________
12/15/2025 update:
Following up on our ongoing work to improve inbound CNAM accuracy, a significant deploy was initiated December 11. While we certainly cannot make guarantees, they have validated this update by running tests against other industry sources and expect it to drive a meaningful improvement in name display quality. Please keep an eye on your inbound call displays starting from this past Thursday 12/11/2025.
While we are confident this will address many of the discrepancies you've reported, we will be monitoring the results closely. We’d appreciate your feedback - please let us know if you observe the expected improvements or if specific gaps remain.
__________________________________________________________________________________________________
11/20/2025 update:
The team is working every day on the CNAM issue and making progress by uploading more records to our vendor and working with industry partners. Your detailed examples remain extremely valuable to us, and they help us pinpoint unresolved cases so we can address them more effectively.
__________________________________________________________________________________________________________
11/4/2025 update: Thank you for your patience as we continue to address the recent service challenges. We know many of you are still experiencing issues, and we understand how frustrating this can be. While our vendor has made progress and is seeing improvements, there’s still work to do to restore the experience you expect.
We are collaborating closely with our partners to resolve the remaining issues as soon as possible.
__________________________________________________________________________________________________
10/31/2025 update: I have shared with the team that while there are improvements, the issue remains. I have asked the vendor for an update and will update the thread when I hear more. Thanks for your patience and reports.
____________________________________________________________________________________________________
Hi Everyone,
Our vendor released another update on Saturday to help ensure the correct name is more accurately selected for display.
The results are being closely monitored, included reviewing specific examples.
If you have more instances to report after 10/20 that you haven't yet, you can add your report to the email from your support case or you can message me (click on my username and you will see a “message” option on the next page) and I will share this with the team.
Please use this format:
- To:
• From:
• Time/Date:
• Caller-ID Shown:
• Caller-ID Expected:
• Disposition:
Please also share your experience here, we are closely monitoring this thread, if you see things returning to normal that would be helpful to know.
Thank you for your continued patience as we work to resolve Caller ID display inconsistencies.
GregG2
2 months agoActive Contributor
Hello. For what it is worth, we have had reports in the past few weeks of our outgoing being wrong. Incoming is still an issue as of this morning.
KateG
2 months agoGoTo Manager
For Outbound caller ID issues, our vendor has informed us that you may have seen discrepancies with Outbound Caller ID over the past few weeks, however, they have successfully published your LIDB (outbound Caller ID) record on our end. They also updated the core industry routing systems, so all carriers now know where to find your updated info.
If someone is still seeing an unexpected name when you call them, that’s likely an issue with their carrier’s CNAM provider. Sometimes, these providers haven’t picked up the latest industry updates yet, might be using old cached data, or may rely on a different database entirely. Since each carrier and provider manages their own data lookups, unfortunately, we can’t make them change how they do things.
The quickest way to get this fixed is for the person receiving your calls to contact their own phone provider and open a support ticket. If they ask their provider to investigate why the Caller ID name isn’t correct and confirm they’re using the right industry sources, that usually helps get things moving.
We’re confident everything is set on our side. But if their provider shares any specific info—like which database they’re using to look up Caller ID—please let us know! That detail could help us dig deeper if needed.
GregG2 For issues with your Inbound Caller ID, can you message me the information? I would like to create a case for the team.